Athena’s Reply
نویسنده
چکیده
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Athena is pleased to know the interest of Prof. Prasad in her analytical review.[1] Rare diseases and controversies go hand in glove because no one has adequate experience to authoritatively affirm or refute claims. Neonatal appendicitis (NA) is no exception to this general rule. The exact pathogenesis of NA is not known. As Athena concluded, it may be related to necrotizing enterocolitis because both the diseases share many risk factors.[2] Dr. Prasad thinks that NA is a local manifestation of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).[1] Even if it were true, the cause-effect relationship between the two becomes contentious. Septicemia of NA may cause SIRS and vice versa. Although parietal edema, palpable mass, erythema and tenderness are non-specific of NA, the diagnostic emphasis is on their localization in the right iliac fossa. To conclude, Athena had concluded because she philosophizes that a conclusion is not a conclusion but a beginning. REFERENCES 1. Prasad GR. Athena's pages on neonatal appendicitis.
منابع مشابه
Author’s Reply to “A Note on the Simulation of Gas Diffusion in Capillaries and Porous Solids”
متن کامل
Transfer from action to perception: The effect of motor-perceptual enrichment
This study investigated the effect of audiovisual integration on action-perception transfer.40 subjects were randomly divided four groups: visual, visual-auditory, control visual and control visual-auditory. Visual groups watched pattern skilled basketball player and other groups in addition to watching pattern skilled basketball player, heard Elbow angular velocity as sonification. In first st...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015